| ● Mainpage ● Board Guidelines/Rules ● Help ● Search ● Members ● Calendar |
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
|
|
| drlong888 |
Posted: November 01, 2008 01:10 pm
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: October 21, 2008 |
hello komrads. just want to get something clear before i buy my first ak74u. i was going to buy an a kls rk01s, the improved all steel dboys version with no pot metal. However, i was warned that it wasnt a good idea because the dboys ak74u has a floating barrel and hop up assembly and can break easily. I was told to get the cyma version instead and that cyma has an all steel ak74u also. so now im getting a bit confused... I hope someone can help me.
|
| zenTaurus |
Posted: November 02, 2008 11:16 am
|
![]() Group: Admin1 Posts: 1650 Joined: May 10, 2007 |
Face Off , a comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of the CM 035 and the RK 01. makikita mo rin ito: Shakedown : full field test of the 035. marami ditong magagandang info na makakatulong sa 'yo. but you have to exert some effort before asking a question. pasyal ka sa mga threads at baka sakaling marami kang mapulot. btw, the RK01S does not have a floating barrel. not even the IB is full floating. AFAIK, it is not true that it does NOT have ANY pot metal. to test, put a magnet to the metal. pag hindi dumikit magnet, zinc alloy un. point three: it is not the float that is the weakness -- that is normally considered a strength by those who know. it is the quality of the casting of Kalash alloy that makes it relatively weaker than Cyma alloy. point four: the main selling points of Kalash models are that they are constructed like the RS, are considered better looking by many knowledgeable AdiKs kesa dun sa mga katapat na Cyma variant, at mas malakas ang spring OOTB. if these models really have no pot metal, they would be stronger, not weaker. preho ng tutoong Kalashnikov, kahit sagasaan mo ng malaking van, hindi masisira. pero hwag tangke, durog sigurado 'yon.
|
| alakdan.net [aka 9th] |
Posted: November 02, 2008 09:07 pm
|
![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2837 Joined: May 06, 2007 |
If you are lucky enough both the kalash and cyma release a good newer version(Much Higher quality from the previous release.
I got two cyma, the other one now slowly broken especially the moving parts but the other one which is bugbog sa laro mas matibay. We call sometimes maybe a factory defect or a lemon. Well i saw some kalash here from airsoft hobby shop that look like the one with good quality. Read 1st the face off review... Add... If you choice cyma, they look like a TM in terms of takedown, i am a tech(not so expert) so i love it. If Kalash, takedown is the same as Real steel. They both good, you won't regret, my daughter says..."mini maini mo"
"The eM-poR is a cheap prostitute. She needs to be dressed with flashy accessories to be attractive. The kalashnikov is beautiful in herself. She does not need stilettos and lipstick. You may want to have a one night stand with a Stoner Rifle, but you marry the Kalashnikov.™" |
| drlong888 |
Posted: November 03, 2008 12:52 pm
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: October 21, 2008 |
thank you komrads. basically, i need to know if cyma actually released an all steel version like the kls rk01s. i hear there is a cm035a (probably the wood handguard version) and some claim they have a cm035b. but when i do research i only come up with the cm035 reviews which is the one with plastic handguard with pot metal shown in the shakedown and the face off.
|
| vityaz |
Posted: November 03, 2008 02:07 pm
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 346 Joined: May 23, 2007 |
some reviewers do not always use the same model designation of the manufacturer. neither do retailers.
|
|
|